WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE--NOT BENGHAZI

Today, we have this report :

IRS IG Report: Targeting Conservatives Began In 2010

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/irs-began-targeting-conservatives-in-2010/

VIDEO at Link

By Jonathan Karl
@jonkarl

The targeting of conservatives by the IRS started earlier and was more extensive than the IRS acknowledged last week, according to a draft IRS inspector general report obtained by ABC News.

As we reported on “Good Morning America” this morning, the IRS began targeting “Tea Party or similar organizations” in March 2010. That was when the Cincinnati-based IRS unit responsible for overseeing the applications for tax exempt status starting using the phrases “Tea Party,” “patriots” and “9/12″ to search for applications warranting greater scrutiny.

During this first phase, 10 Tea Party cases were identified. By April of 2010, 18 Tea Party organizations were targeted, including three that had already been approved for tax-exempt status.

By June 2011, the unit had flagged over 100 Tea Party-related applications and the criteria used to scrutinize organizations had grown considerably, flagging not just “Tea Party” or “Patriot” in group names, but also groups that were working on issues like “government debt,” “taxes” and even organizations making statements that “criticize how the country is being run.”

The report, done by the Inspector General for the IRS, also shows that senior IRS officials in Washington was aware of what was going on as early as August 4, 2011 when, according to the report, the IRS chief counsel held a meeting with the IRS’s Rulings and Agreements unit “so that everyone would have the latest information on the issue.”

Click here to see the draft report.

Related: Senator Says Obama Should Condemn IRS Targeting

Related: IRS Targeted Tea Party Groups

==========================================================

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 28, 2009 09:06 AM

I talked about Dealergate on Fox and Friends this morning. Will try and get the video clip up later today. I made sure to credit bloggers Doug Ross and Joey Smith, who took the lead in probing the relationship between political considerations and Chrysler dealerships targeted for closure, alsoHot Air, which is where the F&F producer saw the story.

The bloggers are continuing their intriguing work. Doug has a new post here shedding more light on Mack McLarty/Robet Johnson’s dealerships. Joey has more info on Lithia Motors here.

As I’ve stated from the beginning, there is still much to be researched on this issue. Given Obama’s Chicago gangland propensities, anything corrupt is possible.

Some professional journalists, however, have shown obstinate unwilligness to get to the bottom of the decision-making process.

The Washington Post’s business columnist Steven Pearlstein was asked about the story yesterday in an online Q&A. He scoffed:

Boonsboro, Md.: A bit off the topic, but have you or anyone at the Post investigated this? Chrysler dealers shut down in Obama bankruptcy are mostly Republican? It seems a crosscheck of dealerships to be closed versus donations shows almost all the dealers to be closed donated to Republicans. http://hotair.com/

Steven Pearlstein: Oh, please. What percent of all auto dealers are Republican? I bet its (sic) pretty high.

Well, why don’t you use all your professional journalism training and find out the answer, Mr. Pearlstein? And why don’t you look at the flip side of the question — as “amateur” bloggers have been doing — and investigate the circumstances of the protected dealers?

Pearlstein is not alone in dismissing the blogosphere out of hand. The impulse to denigrate blogs is borne of professional protectionism.

Ace reflects on the conservative blog-MSM dynamic:

Here’s a dilemma for conservatives. The MSM will not investigate any of these claims, ever. So what is a conservative to do? If a conservatives admit that this line of inquiry seems unlikely to turn up malfeasance, the MSM uses such statements as pretexts to not bother to even check, and uses such statements against conservatives who are agitating for additional investigation — “Even conservatives think this is unlikely, so you guys are obviously crazy…”

Of course I want this looked into, of course. It’s my guess it’s a non-story, not my expert opinion.

But the MSM is so ridiculously biased that they make honesty a dangerous and politically counterproductive business.

The only way to even get the MSM to do their jobs and take a look is to pressure them by claiming Worst Scandal Eveh, even if we don’t all necessarily buy that. But we have to claim that in order to spur any sort of media interest whatsoever. (That interest, of course, coming in the form of stories like Conservatives Now So Crazy They Think Obama Is Closing Chrysler Dealerships for Political Advantage, which isn’t exactly the headline we seek, but that’s the best we can hope for from the MSM.)

A few quick points: I do think that eventually, the MSM will come around to investigating. If they find anything at all that confirms the politicizing of the process, they’ll either whitewash it, downplay it, or take credit for exposing it with little or no credit to the bloggers who first started digging. They’ll also ignore the fact that some of us early on have made the caveat from the start not to make too-broad claims.

I also don’t think it’s necessary to over-sell the story in order to get more mainstream coverage. The fact is, Missouri senators have already pressed the White House for more transparency on the closure decision-making process.

Do the rest of the MSM’s business journalists take Pearlstein’s arrogant “Oh, please” position that the answers are not even worth pursuing

===============================================

Obama Corruption -- Chrysler - A Very Dirty Story by Everett "Larry" McIntyre--Posted August 29, 2012

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/obama-corruption-the-media-will-never-tell-you-he-closed-789-chrysler-dealerships-788-were-th/question-3136035/?page=2

Sooner or later it will all come to light! 

This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate or Clinton's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison. 

Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler Corporation were to be closed? 

Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy. Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and federal government "graciously" offered to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and "save jobs." 

Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail," same story with GM. 

The feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM. Obama, in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to be the White House's official Car Czar - literally, that's what his title is. 

Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM. 
Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of dealerships'. Not true! 

The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner. 

Now the plot thickens.

Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain dealerships were closed?

Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down. Again, on May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.
Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $20000 to Obama's campaign.

Does that seem a little odd to you?

Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together. Well, he happens to be married to a Maureen White. 

Maureen happens to be the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. 

As such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation- Republican or Democrat. But of course, this is just a wacky "coincidence," we're certain.

Then comes another really wacky "coincidence."

On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas , North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri . It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealership in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.

Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier.

These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of RLJ-McClarty-Landers. Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered closed - not one! While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealership were!

Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone. Isn't that amazing?

Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up.
Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the federal court ruling, 65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and the United Auto Workers union! Fiat owns 20%. The other 15% is still privately owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market.

Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the auto industry.

As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the United States of America, it would appear that the president has the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs just because they don't agree with his political agenda

There are voices in Washington demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no information to the public or to any of the senators demanding answers for what has been done.

Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national senator or representative in the House and demand an investigation into this. 

Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." 

Car Czar No More 

An amazing thing happened as this story was going to press. Obama's Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steel workers union boss Ron Bloom. 

According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time with his family." 

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity to bring his unique skills to government service in the future." 

By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New York .....

Uh-oh!
But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation. And, according to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships. Really?

Again, that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous!

Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family."

Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of whom are acting without any Constitutional authority. But hey, we're sure they all have "unique skills,"... as Tim Geithner likes to say!

SOOOOO. HOW'S THE CHANGE WORKING FOR YOU?..

====================================================

MY POINT: OBAMA HAS BEEN DOING THIS SINCE HE WAS ELECTED!!!

Delays hit major airports as control tower furloughs kick in--Obama damages the economy again to prove he is in charge

So, everyone who does not have an Air Force One is required to sit on a runway, wasting time, because Obama created the Sequester, and let it happen.

Then, HE decided what services would be cut.

This reminds me of the propaganda that California puts out about the "Extravagant Retirements" that public services get, especially police and fire. They quote the $100,00 a year retirement payments that a few top officials get, implying that anyone who retired from a police or fire career gets that.

What you DO NOT hear is how much Illegal Aliens draw in benefits in California. In 2010, it was OVER $21 BILLION. Why don't you hear about it? They are Democrat voters.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-jones/why-obama-is-to-blame-for_b_2805155.html

Posted: 03/05/2013 3:20 pm

Why Obama Is to Blame for Sequester Cuts

Over the past four years Republicans have been foolish in so many ways: McConnell's "one-term president" comment, the debt crisis, a ridiculous presidential campaign, and an open civil war have all contributed to a weaker party. These failings, among countless others, have left the party vulnerable and have strengthened President Obama's political position -- to the point where he can win almost any political battle in which he chooses to participate.

But, just because he can win doesn't mean he should fight.

I fear that President Obama has decided to fight every battle with the goal of crushing the opposition, rather than seeking conclusions that benefit the American people. His decision to continually campaign, rather than govern, could have negative and lasting consequences on our country.

The recent stalled discussions regarding the sequester, a poorly coordinated 2.4 percent immediate cut to the U.S. budget, is just another example of a fight that wasn't necessary. Over the past few years, I would lay much of the blame for congressional deadlock on Republicans, as they have stalled and blocked and filibustered; but this time is different.

The problem is this: Mr. Obama may win every battle, and yet our country may end up losing. Bob Woodward, the respected journalist who took down a powerful Republican president, has asserted that President Obama has "moved the goalposts" in his final sequester proposal. 

Mr. Woodward has had more access to negotiations than any other outsider and has interviewed countless individuals on both sides of the aisle. With this trove of insight forming his conclusions, he believes Mr. Obama has negotiated in a way that was not in the best interest of the American people.

From Woodward, we know that McConnell and Boehner agreed to extend the fiscal cliff beyond the election with the understanding that either the sequester would go forward or Congress would find more appropriate cuts (not tax increases). Now that the time for sequestration has come, Mr. Obama has decided to he wants to use this new "crisis" as a political football. Rather than proposing a new set of targeted cuts or agreeing to Republican suggestions -- as he led Congress to believe he would. Instead, President Obama has proposed closing tax loopholes (which functionally amounts to raising taxes).

In the final weeks before the sequester deadline, President Obama campaigned furiously, blaming republicans for the cuts and calling for them to compromise. However, he, too, refused to compromise, as he proposed a sequester alternative that he knew the Republicans could not accept. After acquiescing to his demands just two months earlier, he knew it would be politically impossible for them to raise taxes again, yet he was unwilling to yield in his proposals. He then proceeded to use scare tactics (as Bush did with his war on terrorism) to increase support for his position.

As president, Obama has the power and he is winning the argument. In a purely political sense, this fight has been very good for him and his party. He has considerable public support and does not need the "political win" the sequester could provide, so why play hardball and risk the country's well being? Rather than using the trust he has built to win the war for America, Obama decided he wanted to use his capital to win a fight with unpopular Republicans.

Public opinion seems to be indicating that the president has won this battle, as he has won the last several battles with Congress. The problem is this: one crisis after another is having a cumulative negative effect on the people of America, on the economy, on consumer confidence, on credit ratings -- on everything! 

The economy only grew by 0.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012 and looks to be stalling. Now is the time for the president to use his popularity and his position to do more than win political arguments.

Obama is winning the battle but America is losing the war.

http://www.southbendtribune.com/sns-rt-us-usa-faa-furloughsbre93l03e-20130421,0,4570158.story

(VIDEO at Link)

Flight delays could get worse as federal budget cuts are now hitting air traffic controllers. CBS News' Sharyl Attkisson reports.

By Alwyn ScottReuters

8:46 a.m. EDT, April 22, 2013

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Travelers waited more than an hour for flights in New York and experienced delays at other U.S. airports on Sunday evening as furloughs of air traffic controllers began, reducing the ability of busy hubs to handle arrivals and departures, theFederal Aviation Administration said.

The furloughs that started Sunday reduced staffing by 10 percent across the country. Last week the FAA warned of delays up to 3-1/2 hours at some airports as the agency cuts spending to meet reductions required under federal budget cuts.

New York's LaGuardia and John F. Kennedy airports reported delays of more than an hour, and Philadelphia international airport also reported delays due to furloughs, the FAA said.

Los Angeles International reported nearly a two-hour delay at 10 pm ET, and Newark Liberty International reported 28-minute delays, though the FAA could not confirm whether those were related to the staff cuts. Delays of up to 58 minutes in San Francisco and 29 minutes in Orlando, Florida, were due to construction and weather, the FAA said.

"Relatively good weather throughout the country and light traffic helped minimize air traffic delays," FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said.

The delays come as the FAA furloughs its 47,000 employees, including nearly 13,000 air traffic controllers who manage the nation's airspace.

The furloughs are set to last through September, the end of the U.S. fiscal year, and are expected to save about $200 million of the $637 million the agency must cut from its $16 billion budget, the FAA said last week.

Paul Rinaldi, president of the Air Traffic Controllers Association, said about 1,200 to 1,500 controllers will be staying home each day, on average, and that some airports might be able to shift staffing to reduce the effect of the furloughs. U.S. airports handle about 25,000 flights a day, he said.

(Editing by Mary Milliken and Stacey Joyce)

SO--Why am I not surprised. 
Well, as a law enforcer in California, you see all kinds. You get to know who needs to be in a padded room, and who is just fine out on their own.

In California, you could submit a person to a County Mental Health facility, and they could be held for 48 hours for tests and examination per Sec. 5150 of the Welfare and Institutions Code ---IF... A "mental health professional" declared them to be " A danger or threat to themselves or others". 

BUT- my perception of psychiatrists, psychologists, is that the person you submit for an exam damn near had to beat the crap out of that "Mental Health Professional" before they would make that declaration. 

Common Occurrence: You took a person into CMH (County Mental Health). You took them in. An hour later, they let them walk out the front door. 

The University of Colorado Denver psychiatrist seeing accused murderer James Eagan Holmes was so alarmed by his behavior that she notified the campus-wide threat-assessment team that she helped create years before, a source told The Denver Post.

Dr. Lynne Fenton, identified in a court document as Holmes' psychiatrist, in June took her concerns to members of the campus' Behavioral Evaluation and Threat Assessment team, but no further action was taken, a source with knowledge of the process told The Post.

University officials could not confirm or deny the report, citing the federal health privacy law and a judge's gag order in the case against Holmes.

The information was first reportedlate Wednesday by Denver's KMGH-TV, 7News. The station, citing unnamed sources, reported that CU-Denver officials did not contact Aurora police before the July 20 massacre at the Century Aurora 16 theater that killed 12 people and injured 58 others. There was no mention in the report of whether CU-Denver police were notified.

The Anschutz Medical Campus, where Holmes, 24, was enrolled in a doctoral program, is in Aurora.

He has been charged with 24 counts of first-degree murder and 116 counts of attempted murder in the case.

Fenton, director of student mental health services on the Anschutz Medical Campus, in 2010 was involved in the creation of the campus BETA team. The team is an ad hoc group of high-level CU academic employees skilled at assessing potential threats on campus. The group does not include CU-Denver police.

University Chancellor Don Elliman said Wednesday, "I believe, until it's been demonstrated otherwise, that our people did what they should have done."

In April 2010, Fenton was among three people who gave a presentation about the creation of the BETA team to the Academic and Student Affairs Leadership committee. The team will be a "way to determine when student action moves from an academic concern only to a broader campus concern," according to minutes from the meeting.

"One of the most difficult aspects is knowing when immediate action is required, or if there is time to convene the BETA team to discuss the issues," the minutes say.

"Generally, if you believe the threat is imminent, call campus police. If you think it's best to involve the BETA team, contact Lynne Fenton," the minutes say.

Fenton no longer is a BETA team leader but remains an adviser to the program, CU officials said.

CU's website says the BETA team is available whenever faculty, staff or student community members are confronted with people they believe are threatening, disruptive or otherwise problematic.

The team provides guidance and consultation and may make referrals to appropriate campus or community resources. It is not a law enforcement mechanism, said CU officials in a statement released Wednesday.

7News reported Wednesday that a source said Fenton first contacted the BETA team in "the first 10 days" of June, but the team didn't meet or move the matter forward because Holmes began the process of leaving CU.

Under a federal rule followed by psychiatrists, Fenton had a duty to take action if Holmes told her of a specific plan to harm others.

The revelation that Fenton was Holmes' psychiatrist came in a motion by Holmes' defense attorneys made public last week. That information has since been blacked out in the document posted on the Colorado State Judicial Branch's website.

Holmes had sent a package with a notebook to Fenton before the attack, according to court papers made public last week.

Fox News, citing unnamed law enforcement sources, said the package was sent several days before the attack and contained details about his murderous plan.

The university has said the package was delivered on July 23 and immediately turned over to authorities.

Staff writer Lynn Bartels and Staffer Charles Minshew contributed to this story.

James Holmes referred to University of Colorado threat-assessment team, sources say - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_21212797/alleged-theater-gunman-was-referred-threat-assessment-team#ixzz2Pi5iG71z

A Glaring Example

High-profile vocalists, including 2009 presidential inauguration singer Aretha Franklin, are coming to Beyoncé Knowles' defense since the singer came under fire for reportedly lip-synching the "Star Spangled Banner" at President Obama's inauguration Monday.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/posts/la-et-ms-0124-beyonce-20130124,0,1755619.story

Pushy parents Beyoncé and Jay-Z installed bulletproof glass and burly bodyguards at the Upper East Side hospital where their diva daughter was just born — and even booted worried moms and dads out of the neonatal intensive-care unit.

The fuming other parents at Lenox Hill Hospital said they were essentially put on “lockdown” so that the pampered songstress and her party could come and go as they pleased.

“They just used the hospital like it was their own and nobody else mattered,” blasted new dad Neil Coulon, who said his efforts to see his premature, newborn twins in the neonatal ICU were disrupted at least four times by the arrival of Beyoncé and her tiny rap princess, Blue Ivy Carter, over the weekend.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/beyonce_hospital_mates_baby_bumped_YyFVyNbtrcBeOfhkT8QgiN

So, someone found out that Beyonce "lip-Synced" the national Anthem .

What is surprising to me is that it was revealed. Usually, State-Controlled. Obamaphile MainStreanMedia keeps a tight lid on anything

that could embarrass "The One".

But, more than that, to me, it is an indicator of this entire administration.

EXAMPLES

We were told there was an "Arab Spring", that once Obama's fellow Muslim fanatics were released from the grip of Khadafy and Mubarak there would be this glorious democracy--BS

Obama was arming and supporting Al-Quaida and Muslim Brotherhood types knowing that once they took over, all other religions would be forced out and you would have several more Irans.

We were told that Obama was going to purify the air and water, and supply us with energy to run the United States via Solar and Wind Power--BS

1. An Engineering professor at Carnegie Mellon University did computations and found that Solar and Wind could provide--at best--5% of our needed power.

2. Experience has shown that Obama got taxpayer money to "Loan" to his campaign contributors to build wind and solar devices. After a "Show" of making some of these devices,

the companies declared bankruptcy, i.e, they don't have to pay the taxpayers back.

We were told that Benghazi was the result of an infuriating video--BS

We soon found out that personnel at the State Dept. WATCHED what occurred in real time.

My conclusion is that this whole administration and what they have done is a corrupt lie.

So, Beyonce lip-syncing the National Anthem is like just another grain of sand on the beach. Beyonce fits right in with this administration in that they condemn 

the rich, while exerting monetary control over the middle class. 

Dave Hollenbeck

Two respected aircraft

The Jets vs Obama team--a comparison

Last night, since it was Thanksgiving, and that is supposed to be a family thing, I watched a football game with my wife and eldest son. I rarely watch football, having lost any belief in 

the validity of the officiating about 10 years ago. So, we are watching . In the 2nd quarter, the Jets screw up SO BAD. In later times, clips will be shown with this music behind it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnHmskwqCCQ

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/jets/sanchez_blooper_fumble_highlights_8fGvwmnnTrz8xnRImhUqTO

Sanchez blooper fumble epitomizes embarrassing Jets performance

• By BRIAN COSTELLO

The Jets handed out scarves before last night’s game with the Patriots. They should have given out paper bags for fans to wear over their heads instead.

This was a Jets loss from the Rich Kotite era — a bumbling, embarrassing, humiliating thrashing from the Patriots that ruined the Thanksgiving of every Jets fan.

What a bunch of turkeys.

Rex Kotite, er Ryan, and Co. got blown out on national television in their own building, turning the ball over five times and losing 49-19 to Bill Belichick’s Patriots in front of an angry holiday crowd at MetLife Stadium.

WATCH: SANCHEZ FUMBLES RUNNING INTO TEAMMATE'S BUTT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yVgmv_laiQs#!

At one point Ryan was caught by TV cameras saying “Un-bleeping-believable.” It got so bad “Fireman Ed” left at halftime.

“Obviously that was a nightmare of a game to say the least,” Ryan said.

The game got away from the Jets in a stunning, 52-second, second-quarter sequence when the Patriots scored three touchdowns — one on offense, one on defense and one on special teams. The sequence was the funniest thing NBC has shown on Thursday night since “Seinfeld” went off the air

.

So, this morning , I go out to feed and clean our horses. My mind wanders as I do this. Usually, I associate one series of events with another which are supposedly NOT related. 

Then, it hit me: The Obama Administration is to Government as the Jets are to football. 

You just read the N Y Post's description of the Jets' comedic loss--accomplished in 52 seconds. 

In the last 4 years,  Obama's team has:

Stolen a car company and gave it to the UAW

Cheated the car companies management out their pensions

Closed auto dealers, putting them out of business, based on how much money they had donated to Republicans in the 2008 election.

Had the ATF violate federal law by forcing gun dealers (under threat of losing their license to sell guns) sell guns to convicted felons, who then turned the guns over to some of the world's worst organized crime . We--Other than Obamaphiles--discovered this when Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed by one of those guns. 

Was shipping weapons to the Al Quaida backed "Rebels" fighting in Syria. These same rebels are using those guns to kill Christians. The weapons were trans-shipped through Libya (Where Obama had helped depose and kill the established ruler of Libya by arming the "Rebels" there, and using U S forces (Without bothering to get U S Congressional approval) for air strikes against that ruler. We found out about this when "Rebels" (we know not who hired them. The best guess is Russia, as Russia backs Syria and wants that flow of weapons stopped) killed two diplomats, two CIA agents and fired a top admiral and a general. 

Some Just don't quit

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151439619766038&set=vb.216940628328775&type=2&theater



Marine Special Operator in Afghanistan 2/8

Brought to you by that Vietnam Veteran, Oliver North 

An evaluation of THE Debate Romney vs Obama